| Prop 65 Report |  |
| TEST REPORT NO. QDHL2003001412CW |
| PRODUCT NAME: | Cali Jar |
| PRODUCT TYPE: | Glass Candle Jar |
| PRODUCT RECOMMEND USE: | Candle and Candle Decor Purposes |
| COMPANY: | California Candle Supply |
| 1011 E Route 66 | |
| Glendora, CA 91740 | |
| REPORT PREPARED BY: | SGS |
| SGS REF No. | TAOHG2000539801 |
| TEST REQUESTED |
| US California Proposition 65 - Lead Content | Pass |
| US California Proposition 65 - Cadmium Content |
Pass |
| US California Proposition 65 - Pthalate Content |
Pass |
Unless otherwise specified the results shown in this test report refer only to the sample(s) tested
Test Performed by SGS-CSTC Standards
Technical Services (Qingdao)
Co.,LTD.
| TEST PART DESCRIPTION |
| Specimen No. | SGS Sample ID | Description |
| SN1 | TAO20-005398.001 | White coating on glass |
| SN2 | TAO20-005398.002 | Black coating on glass |
Remarks:
| (1) | 1 mg/kg = 0.0001% |
| (2) | MDL=Method Detection Limit |
| (3) | ND = Not Detected |
| (4) | "-" = Not Regulated |
| US CALIFORNIA PROP 65 - LEAD CONTENT |
Test method: With reference to CPSC Test Method: CPSC-CH-E1003-09.1 Analysis was performed by ICP-OES
| Test Items | Limit | Unit | MDL | 001 |
| Lead (Pb) |
90 |
mg/kg |
20 | ND |
| Comment: |
|
Pass | ||
| Test Items |
Limit |
Unit |
MDL | 002 |
| Lead (Pb) |
90 |
mg/kg |
20 | ND |
| Comment: | Pass |
Notes:
| (1) |
The limit Is referenced to the requirement stated in the County of Alameda Superior Court, Amended consolidated case RG-09-459448. |
| (2) |
The reference limit applied In testing is based on particular California Proposition 65 settlements that are most similar to the tested product in the opinion of the lab. The testing In this report does not reflect a user's actual exposure to the tested chemical. A manufacturer or retailer that is not named in the referenced settlement is not bound by that settlement, and may choose to comply with California Proposition 65 by clearly informing the consumer of potential exposure. |
| US CALIFORNIA PROP 65 - LEAD CONTENT |
Test method: With reference to CPSC Test Method: CPSC-CH-E1003-09.1 Analysis was performed by ICP-OES
| Test Items | Limit | Unit | MDL | 001 |
| Lead (Pb) |
90 |
mg/kg |
20 | ND |
| Comment: |
|
Pass | ||
| Test Items |
Limit |
Unit |
MDL | 002 |
| Lead (Pb) |
90 |
mg/kg |
20 | ND |
| Comment: | Pass |
Notes:
| (1) |
The limit Is referenced to the requirement stated in the County of Alameda Superior Court, Amended consolidated case RG-09-459448. |
| (2) |
The reference limit applied In testing is based on particular California Proposition 65 settlements that are most similar to the tested product in the opinion of the lab. The testing In this report does not reflect a user's actual exposure to the tested chemical. A manufacturer or retailer that is not named in the referenced settlement is not bound by that settlement, and may choose to comply with California Proposition 65 by clearly informing the consumer of potential exposure. |
| US CALIFORNIA PROP 65 - CADMIUM CONTENT |
Test method: With reference to CPSC Test Method: CPSC-CH-E1003-09.1 Analysis was performed by ICP-OES
| Test Items | CAS NO. | Limit | Unit | MDL | 001 |
| Dibutyl Phthalate (DBP) | 84-74-2 |
1000 |
mg/kg |
50 | ND |
| Benzylbutyl Phthalate (BBP) | 85-68-7 |
1000 |
mg/kg | 50 | ND |
| Di-(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate (DEHP) | 117-81-7 |
1000 |
mg/kg |
50 | ND |
| Diisodecyl Phthalate (DIDP) | 26761-40-0/685151-49-1 |
1000 |
mg/kg |
50 | ND |
| Di-n-hexyl Phthalate (DnHP) | 84-75-3 | 1000 | mg/kg | 50 | ND |
| Diisononyl Phthalate (DINP) | 28553-12-0/68515-48-0 | 1000 | mg/kg | 50 | ND |
| Comment: | Pass |
| Test Items | CAS NO. | Limit | Unit | MDL | 001 |
| Dibutyl Phthalate (DBP) | 84-74-2 |
1000 |
mg/kg |
50 | ND |
| Benzylbutyl Phthalate (BBP) | 85-68-7 |
1000 |
mg/kg | 50 | ND |
| Di-(2-ethylhexyl) Phthalate (DEHP) | 117-81-7 |
1000 |
mg/kg |
50 | ND |
| Diisodecyl Phthalate (DIDP) | 26761-40-0/685151-49-1 |
1000 |
mg/kg |
50 | ND |
| Di-n-hexyl Phthalate (DnHP) | 84-75-3 | 1000 | mg/kg | 50 | ND |
| Diisononyl Phthalate (DINP) | 28553-12-0/68515-48-0 | 1000 | mg/kg | 50 | ND |
| Comment: | Pass |
Notes:
| (1) |
The limit is referenced to the requirement as stated In the County of Marin Court Case No. CIV 091146 and the County of Santa Clara Case No.114CV267501. |
| (2) |
The reference limit applied in testing Is based on particular California Proposition 65 settlements that are most similar to the tested product in the opinion or the lab. The testing in this report does not reflect a user's actual exposure to the tested chemical. A manufacturer or retailer that is not named in the referenced settlement is not bound by that settlement,and may choose to comply with California Proposition 65 by clearly informing the consumer of potential exposure. |
Sample Photo:
 |
 |
SGS authenticate the photo on original report only